Riparian Rights of Front-Lot Owners: The Statutory “Base Fee”

The Court upheld the presumption established in prior cases that only fee simple ownership of an intervening strip or an express reservation in an applicable recorded instrument can sever riparian rights of a front-lot owner. In 2000 Baum, although the statutory “base fee” dedication of the strip of land “to the use of the public” was deemed vested in fee for public use pursuant to the Plat Act, the Court determined that the conveyance did not divest riparian rights, rejecting the road commission’s claim to fee title and the back-lot owners’ access and usage claims. 

Read the full article [here]| State Bar of Michigan

Advertisements

About sikoralaw

Sikora Law has operations in Michigan and Ohio. With a network of attorney relationships in multiple states, we combine the friendly familiarity of a small firm with the institutional knowledge and capabilities generally only found at a large firm. Sikora Law has the resources to deal with your situation with the right lawyer – or the right team of lawyers – and provide reliable, comprehensive, and responsive legal representation . We combine experience, creativity, and technology to efficiently and effectively protect our clients' interests and meet their goals.
This entry was posted in Recent Case Law and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s